A few months later, however, I was surprised when WXIX debuted a sequel to that original picture, THE DALEK'S INVASION EARTH 2150 AD. This one had a bigger budget and I thought it was a better picture. Cushing returned as the lovable old scientist. This time his time machine that looks like a police cal box takes him and his friends--including a police officer who had tried to actually USE the police box--into a future where the Earth itself had been conquered by the Daleks from the first picture. The Daleks had a cool spaceship, there was a memorable score and I particularly liked the actor who played the police officer, Bernard Cribbins.
I liked this second film so much that the next time it ran on CREATURE FEATURES, I sat quietly in front of the TV for two hours and audio-taped the entire film, editing out the commercials. As far as I knew, that was the end of DOCTOR WHO. Just those two movies. Or so I thought.
I was, by mid-1970, regularly reading the magazine, FAMOUS MONSTERS OF FILMLAND. Somewhere in one of the issues they ran a photograph that was described as being from DOCTOR WHO. It was a butterfly monster of some sort. I knew it had NOT been in ether of the movies. I was confused. I re-read the caption again and it said it was from the British TELEVISION series, DOCTOR WHO! I presumed that Cushing had taken his slightly dotty character to TV in his own country as it wasn't really popular enough to merit a third film.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60aa7/60aa73f960e3c65c196e55a94a01be852fff1241" alt=""
Over the next few years, I'd get more and more tantalizing glimpses in TBG and elsewhere and piece together the fact that Cushing was only a part of the bigger picture--and a rather small part at that! By 1979, Cincinnati's PBS station, WCET, picked up the DOCTOR WHO series and started with what was, by then, the current Doctor, one Tom Baker. That first Baker serial, "Robot," was shown in one big movie length lump...and I wasn't thrilled. Tom Baker was a rather eccentric looking English chap who seemed to be channeling Harpo Marx. He still had the police box time machine but no granddaughter, Instead, his companions were a young woman--one Sarah Jane Smith--and a male named Harry. They carried much of the action although there actually wasn't much of it. And it was SO cheap looking! THIS was what I had been reading was so popular worldwide?
But I stuck with it and before long the stories got better, the actor's charisma won me over and I became a big fan. In fact, when I started working full-time, I always insisted I needed off on Saturdays in time to get home to catch the Doctor.
And he was THE Doctor. Not Doctor Who. Never.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f0a8/8f0a84a19ba7b799c865089beddaaff102b22e9b" alt=""
One of my friends, also a DOCTOR WHO fan, went to England in the early eighties and sent me back a magazine all about the NEW Doctor, one Peter Davison whom I knew vaguely from his US appearances on PBS's ALL CREATURES GREAT AND SMALL. Davison was very, very different from Baker and his Doctor was different as well. Eventually, he would become one of my favorites although his scripts weren't always the best quality.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9401/e9401b950c0f2d7f6653207e620d550c53587265" alt=""
Sylvester McCoy came next, again bringing a delightfully eccentric character and one of the most enjoyable combinations of Doctor and companion alongside Sophie Aldred's "Ace." They were unfortunately saddled with more less than wonderful scripts. What the problem was I don't know but it seems that from 5-7, they had no problem creating interesting characters but were rarely able to find interesting things for them to do.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9326/e9326089e04433dee92c8d31c34c98e7d36cc101" alt=""
By that point there was a cottage industry in WHO both in the UK and the US. Several hardcover books, a number of unofficial histories, hundreds of novels and the formerly weekly magazine, now a slick monthly.
But it was still canceled.
In 1991, I was married to a woman I had met in 1987. The first time I looked at her twice was when I found out she, too, was a Whovian.
Cut to 1996 when NBC teamed with the BBC for a highly-publicized TV movie with Paul McGann
But it flopped. After that, it was clear that DOCTOR WHO was completely dead.
Only it wasn't. The fan movement not only continued but grew bigger and bigger. Various former Doctors appeared in various audio adaptations both for tape and on the BBC. There were odd semi-spinoffs pairing former Doctors and companions and the Doctor became a staple of pop culture conventions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1ff4/a1ff4d009534403accb8904b951dcc0ca9c13d15" alt=""
Cut to 2005 when once again DOCTOR WHO was revived. The early released photos showed a short-haired guy in a simple leather jacket. I was convinced they had ruined the character by modernizing him and ignored it completely. Then, after a half dozen episodes had aired, a woman at work was raving about it. I told her I wasn't interested anymore. Then she brought me discs she had burned of those first episodes. I took them home and immediately became enamored with Christopher Eccleston and Billie Piper! Soon enough, I was following it religiously and introducing others to the new Doctor!
I was very disappointed when Eccleston left after only one season and was once again convinced it was over.
Then I discovered David Tennant and it all started anew, and yet better than ever before. After several years of wonderful performances and episodes--some of the best television I have ever seen!--we even got Bernard Cribbins back!
I wasn't thrilled with losing Tennant. Neither was the BBC. By that point, DOCTOR WHO was the Beeb's biggest international success and Tennant their biggest star! But once again, Matt Smith was perfect and his Doctor won over a by-now very demanding audience!
That was interesting and entertaining in equal measure. You don't usually write such detailed reminiscences. One thing, however: although 'The Doctor' is nowadays regarded as the only proper way to refer to him, 'Doctor Who' as a form of address is really equally as valid as the other. You see, the credits of the early programmes listed the character as 'Doctor Who', as did the Eccleston shows when the series was revived in 2005.
ReplyDeleteSteve -
ReplyDeleteLike you, I discovered the show on PBS around 1980 or so. I am on a quest to watch every episode of Doctor Who (episodes that are available, of course some are gone forever). I am up to about 1983.
I hope you have heard the exciting news about the Twelfth Doctor. It wasn't at all what I was expecting.
ReplyDeleteI am going to miss Matt Smith but am very much looking forward to Number 12.
http://materioptikon.wordpress.com/2013/08/05/madman-in-a-box/
I think they peaked with Dr. River Song (love her or hate her) and when the Ponds left...well, a lot of the building interest left with them. Though the series continues, I'm not sure anyone who was on the edge of their seat about Amy, Rory or River cares about Corrin. And it's been harder to find bootleg copies of the show, since we can't all aford BBC in America.
ReplyDeleteBut stay tuned, I hear the 12th doctor appears in the 50th anniversary and the new guy they have just announced, is actually #13!!!