tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15624230.post2640313554492216563..comments2023-12-24T18:29:26.864-05:00Comments on BOOKSTEVE'S LIBRARY: Well, Shazam!Bookstevehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09797445163866512849noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15624230.post-74262092852970968792007-04-14T08:26:00.000-04:002007-04-14T08:26:00.000-04:00Michael Uslan is a producer of theShazam movie pro...Michael Uslan is a producer of the<BR/>Shazam movie project. I'd like to<BR/>hear what HE thinks about the<BR/>screenwriter's comments.<BR/>At the very least, Uslan needs to<BR/>do some major damage control!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15624230.post-33851216583729541702007-04-11T13:05:00.000-04:002007-04-11T13:05:00.000-04:00I can't figure out how to track down your email fr...I can't figure out how to track down your email from this site but I just wanted to send you a link: <BR/><BR/>http://blogs.usatoday.com/popcandy/2007/04/a_chat_with_wri.html#moreAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15624230.post-59152960333746304862007-04-11T05:48:00.000-04:002007-04-11T05:48:00.000-04:00Ol'Johnny August is sadly mistaken - old stuff rul...Ol'Johnny August is sadly mistaken - old stuff rules!<BR/><BR/>Big Fish and Titan A.E. - now they "sucked" a bit, didn't they? (if I must drag myself into a Laurel & Hardy type tit for tat...)<BR/><BR/>Then again, both of those films are now "old" so maybe he's right after all...Poptiquehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00446061540234057323noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15624230.post-15089664160910625162007-04-10T22:39:00.000-04:002007-04-10T22:39:00.000-04:00Correction: where I wrote "132 a week", read "132 ...Correction: where I wrote "132 a week", read "132 a day".Emilio Pachecohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01104009621178070226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15624230.post-21874082637664528742007-04-10T22:26:00.000-04:002007-04-10T22:26:00.000-04:00Hi, Steve. I haven't come here in a long time. The...Hi, Steve. I haven't come here in a long time. The main reason is that the domain name "blogger" was blocked where I work, so I can read your posts, but I can't see the pictures. And the pictures are the heart and soul of your blog. Here at home I can see them, but there isn't much time for surfing the net. My English language blog is abandoned for now, but I won't delete it yet. I can always come back to it when I find the time.<BR/><BR/>I took the liberty of taking a peek at your Site Meter stats, specifically the "By referrals" list. I have only recently discovered all the information Site Meter provides and I was appalled to discover that Brazilians don't know how to use Google! Most of them (well, us) just type a "request" in plain language, thinking Google will not only understand it but comply with it! There are many search arguments beginning with "I want" or "find" or "search"! Some people "explain" in detail what they want, like "I want to learn everything about photo journalism" or "find songs about this or that on the Internet"! Some of these searches are so funny that I decided to create a weekly feature on my blog: the "clueless searches of the week". Actually, it was rather frustrating to discover that most people find my blog by accident. Well, not all of them. A long time ago I had nothing to write about so I decided to post a picture of a Brazilian actress I found particularly attractive. It so happened that this actress is now starring in a prime time soap opera that began in March, so the visits to my blog jumped from 90 to 150 a day! And just because of that one tiny picture! So much for all my intelligent and witty writings! Right now the visits have gone down to 132 a week, just like your blog. In your case, a lot of people find it looking for Linda Blair. But I have noticed that your visitors are much better informed than mine.<BR/><BR/>I'll try to come back here more often. Keep up the good work.Emilio Pachecohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01104009621178070226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15624230.post-75329466436115943492007-04-10T21:02:00.000-04:002007-04-10T21:02:00.000-04:00Agreed. This guy does not know his history about ...Agreed. This guy does not know his history about Captain Marvel and how great a book it was - and as proven in the sales between Superman and Captain Marvel esp in the 1950;s the Captain is KING. <BR/><BR/>The "old stuff" is GREAT. I am currently reading a graphic novel I picked up from Amazon : THE MONSTER OF FRANKENSTEIN by Dick Briefer. The material was years ahead of its time (and like the EC books was pre-CCA).<BR/><BR/>Captain Marvel and Frankenstein will always have a place in my collection!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com